Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Illinois slaps limits on non-lawyer investor power in law firms

Spread the love

Illinois has become the latest state to restrict the involvement of private equity and other non-lawyer interests in owning or running law firms, enacting legislation supporters say will help to protect the attorney-client relationship and wall off attorney fees from non-lawyers.

In the closing hours of the spring legislative session, Illinois lawmakers approved the legislation known as House Bill 5487.

In an unusual political alignment, the measure drew support from both the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which speaks for the state’s influential lawsuit filers, as well as from the group that normally lines up opposite them in court and on political issues, the Illinois Defense Counsel.

Both groups filed so-called witness slips before the Illinois General Assembly in support of HB 5487.

The measure is not yet law, as it must be signed by Gov. JB Pritzker.

Observers, however, say they expect HB5487 will win an easy endorsement from Pritzker.

The legislation explicitly places limits on the creation and use of so-called alternative business structures (ABS) and management services organizations (MSOs) in law firms.

The legislation defines ABS as a business arrangement which allows non-lawyers to own and lead law firms, and MSOs as an arrangement that gives non-lawyers and outside investors ownership interests in a law firm in exchange for providing certain business services to the firm.

HB 5487 doesn’t explicitly forbid law firms from working with MSOs.

But the legislation prohibits non-lawyers and outside investors from interfering in the “professional judgment of attorneys in representing clients; and

From “owning, or determining” or “revealing” client records and “attorney-client communications; and

From hiring or firing attorneys at the firm with which they may have a professional arrangement; and

Charging “any fee to the attorney or law firm that is directly, or indirectly based on the attorneys’ fees, revenues, or profits…”

The measure also would require law firms to disclose to clients if they have an MSO or ABS arrangement that may be still be allowed under state law.

The use of MSOs and ABS have become hot topics in the legal community in recent years.

Business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, have warned such arrangements would only deepen the involvement of investors in pushing and controlling lawsuits targeted at American companies.

For decades, an ever-growing investment industry have used so-called third party litigation funding to financially back lawsuits in pursuit of potential windfall profits from the funds paid by defendants to settle the lawsuits or under jury verdicts or other judgments.

Business groups and legal reform advocates have warned such outside financing not only warps the legal system, but also threatens the U.S. economy and national security.

So, these groups see the rise of legal services providers operating under ABS to be a new version of that threat, enabling even more direct involvement from private equity and venture capital seeking in the civil justice system.

On the other side, trial lawyers groups have also begun to oppose the use of ABS and MSOs, seeing them as an attempt by private investors to redefine the attorney-client relationship, wrest control of the lawsuit industry and grab a share of attorney fees, as well as the judgments.

As Illinois lawmakers moved this spring to take action, they followed in the path laid by other states, including California and Colorado. Those states passed legislation to address the rise of ABS arrangements in Arizona, which had brought private investment to bear on personal injury cases and other civil actions.

The Arizona ABS system has come under criticism for lack of oversight and financial conflicts of interest, among other critiques.

That system had notably allowed at least one prominent California mass tort firm, Wisner Baum, to spin off some of its business to the ABS known as Eleos Law in Arizona. According to reports, Eleos is 46% owned by non-lawyers and is funded, in part, through 5% of Wisner Baum’s attorney fees.

Eleos reportedly has helped to manage 9,400 lawsuits over alleged injuries caused by the heartburn medication Zantac and 8,450 lawsuits over alleged contamination of baby food.

Such instances helped to spur the legislation in Illinois, as well.

The Illinois Trial Lawyers Association did not issue public statements declaring their support for the legislation or explaining their reasons for registering support for the measure at the General Assembly this spring.

However, the legislation drew the support from some of ITLA’s most prominent legislative allies, including State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, and from Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch.

On the Illinois Defense Counsel side, attorney Dan Cotter, of the firm of Aronberg Goldgehn, of Chicago, said the IDC and ITLA together backed the measure because of its “foundational” nature to “the legal profession.”

Cotter and his colleague, Daniel Patrick Eckler, each entered witness slips before the General Assembly in support of HB 5487. Eckler declined comment, directing questions to Cotter.

Cotter said all sides agreed on the “broader issue of maintaining traditional roles” within the legal system and maintaining “public confidence in the legal system,” by requiring some level of transparency surrounding firm ownership and investor relationships.

Cotter said it was particularly important to address possible ABS-style fee sharing arrangements and to limit non-lawyer control over litigation and limit non-lawyer investor interference in the attorney-client relationship.

Cotter said the lines drawn in the new legislation notably still allow for the involvement of non-lawyer capital investors in the legal business, as long as they don’t interfere with the lawyers’ “professional judgment” in handling cases or law firm business decisions.

“But they can still do a lot of things they are doing,” Cotter said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

frankfort-park-district

Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules

The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it "cannot be...
Meeting-Briefs

In Brief: Ordinance Review Committee Actions

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met June 10 to continue its comprehensive update of the county code. Here are some of the key actions and discussions: Court Fees...
frankfort-park-district.1

Frankfort Park District Kicks Off Busy Summer Season with Races and New Events

The Frankfort Park District is in full summer swing, with a packed schedule of programs and events that includes an expanded day camp, new community parties, and the 25th anniversary...
Will-County-Jail-e1750123778582

Will County Jail Faces Major Staffing Crisis as 70 Employees Eligible to Retire by 2030

County officials warn of potential budget impact as adult detention facility grapples with unprecedented turnover Will County's adult detention facility is heading toward a staffing crisis that could significantly impact...
will-county-board.3

Will County Health Department Reports Sharp Decline in Overdose Deaths

2025 fatalities running 40% lower than previous year, officials attribute success to expanded Narcan distribution Will County is experiencing a significant reduction in overdose deaths, with 2025 fatalities running 40%...
will-county-board

Solar Project Extensions Approved as Industry Faces Permitting Delays

Three solar energy projects received 180-day extensions from Will County's Land Use & Development Committee Thursday as developers continue working through lengthy permitting processes with utility companies and other agencies....
will-county-board.3

Committee Approves Truck Terminal Despite Residential Concerns

A Monee Township truck terminal received approval from Will County's Land Use & Development Committee Thursday despite concerns about its proximity to residential areas. The committee voted 5-1 to approve...
will-county-board

Will County Health Department Faces Funding Uncertainty as Federal Grants Under Review

Multiple revenue sources threatened as department seeks legislative support for public health programs Will County Health Department officials are closely monitoring potential federal funding cuts that could impact multiple programs...

Will County Land Use Meeting Briefs

LAND USE ACTIONS Accessory Dwelling Unit Rules Modified: The committee recommended approval of text amendments allowing accessory dwelling units to exceed current building area limitations in certain circumstances. The changes...
will-county-board.2

Public Health and Safety Committee Meeting Briefs

Sunny Hill Nursing Home Tour Praised: Committee members who attended the May 9 tour of Sunny Hill Nursing Home praised the facility's condition and operations. Member Raquel Mitchell called it...
Medicaid-logo

Federal Reconciliation Bill Targets Medicaid, SNAP Programs

Will County Legislators Briefed on Potential Local Impacts Federal legislation making sweeping cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs could significantly impact Will County residents and services, county legislators learned...
will-county-board.2

Will County Approves Modified $756 Million Transportation Plan Despite Terminology Debate

Will County's Public Works and Transportation Committee approved a five-year, $756 million transportation improvement plan on June 3, but not before a heated debate over whether to call it a...
will-county-board.3

Will County completes major projects while others move forward

Will County's facilities team has completed several major projects while advancing others throughout the county, officials reported during a Capital Improvements & IT Committee meeting Monday. The Old Courthouse Plaza...
will-county-board.3

Will County Accepts $140,000 Developer Donation for Road Improvements

Will County's Public Works and Transportation Committee accepted a $140,143.90 donation from a developer in lieu of constructing traffic improvements along Laraway Road. The donation comes from the Lakes Park...
will-county-board.2

State Legislative Session Wrap-Up Shows Mixed Results

Will County's state legislative priorities saw mixed results as the Illinois General Assembly concluded its spring session on May 31, with several key bills advancing while others stalled. The Legislative...