Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee for March 10, 2026
Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | March 10, 2026
The Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, to review a backlog of proposed updates to Title XI Business Regulations. While sweeping changes to the county’s liquor, tobacco, and video gaming ordinances dominated the discussion and were ultimately postponed for further legal drafting, the committee successfully advanced minor updates to the adult entertainment and wireless telecommunications codes to the Executive Committee.
Adult Entertainment Ordinance Advances:
The committee approved updates to Chapter 119 regarding Adult Entertainment Establishments. The revisions were primarily typographical, including correcting the spelling of “establishment” on page three of the packet. The committee also passed a motion by Board Member Sherry Newquist to strike the word “being” from several sub-items listed under the “Specified Criminal Act” definitions in Section 119.003 for grammatical clarity. Assistant State’s Attorney Phil Mock noted that the county’s adult use regulations are historically designed to be as strict and broad as legally permissible. The ordinance advanced to the Executive Committee unanimously.
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Passed:
The committee approved updates to Chapter 122 covering Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, primarily updating legacy references from the “Department of Highways” to the “Division of Transportation.” During the discussion, Board Member Daniel J. Butler raised concerns regarding the radiation emitted by 5G towers placed in county rights-of-way, particularly given that the ordinance allows new alternative antenna structures to be placed as close as 100 feet apart. Assistant State’s Attorney Phil Mock advised that the county is not home rule and cannot legally force telecommunication companies to disclose radiation levels under the state’s Small Wireless Facilities Deployment Act (50 ILCS 840/1). The measure ultimately passed and advanced, with Butler casting the lone dissenting vote.
Latest News Stories
Arizona, Nevada pay less at the pump than California
EEOC celebrates 200 days of protecting religious freedom under Trump
U.S. mining operations discarding rare minerals at center of trade talks
Duffy warns states to enforce English proficiency requirements for truckers
Illinois quick hits: Chicago businesses at 10-year low; school admin survey closes soon
Pritzker unveils Illinois LGBTQ hotline amid debate over transgender athletes
WATCH: Trump ends funding for cashless bail policies, hedges on Guard deployment to Chicago
Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for August 21, 2025
New Lenox Residents Challenge Industrial Rezoning Plan Over Truck Traffic and Safety Concerns
Vendors Provide Free Replacements for Defective Park District Golf Equipment
Education Department finds GMU Violated Title VI
Redistricting opponents immediately appeal to CA voters
Former Transportation Secretary urges state taxpayer funding for Chicago transit