Frankfort Township Road Commissioner Warns County Panel Against Low-Speed Vehicles
Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | Jan. 13, 2026
Article Summary: The Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee moved forward with a ban on low-speed vehicles on county roadways following testimony from Frankfort Township Road Commissioner Bill Carlson. Officials clarified that the ban applies only to county-maintained roads, leaving townships to create their own regulations.
Ordinance Review Key Points:
-
Safety Concerns: Frankfort Township Road Commissioner Bill Carlson testified that low-speed vehicles (LSVs) and golf carts present a “major issue” and “conscience liability” due to speed differentials with regular traffic.
-
Jurisdictional Limits: Assistant State’s Attorney Phil Mock clarified that the county can only regulate these vehicles on county-maintained highways, not township or municipal roads.
-
Committee Vote: The committee voted 5-1 to move the amended Chapter 75 to the Executive Committee, with Board Member Daniel Butler voting against the measure.
The Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, advanced an ordinance amendment that effectively bans low-speed vehicles from county-maintained roadways, following warnings about public safety from a local highway official.
During the meeting, the committee suspended its rules to allow Frankfort Township Road Commissioner Bill Carlson to speak regarding proposed changes to Chapter 75 of the county code. Carlson, who also serves as president of the Will County Association, expressed deep concern regarding the proliferation of low-speed vehicles (LSVs) and golf carts on local roads.
“The golf carts are totally illegal, 100%,” Carlson told the committee, distinguishing them from LSVs which have state registration, lights, and seatbelts but are limited to 25 mph. Despite the safety features of LSVs, Carlson warned of the dangers they pose when sharing the road with faster traffic.
“Guaranteed somebody’s going to, you know, it could be my plow truck in the middle of the night, run in them, rear-end them,” Carlson said. “It’s a major issue.”
Assistant State’s Attorney Phil Mock explained that the county’s authority is limited. Under the state highway code, the county can only ban these vehicles on county highways. Townships and municipalities must pass their own resolutions to ban them within their specific jurisdictions.
“We can’t legislate for the township roads,” Mock said. “So the township can create their own rules.”
Carlson indicated he intended to draft a resolution for Frankfort Township immediately following the clarification. “I don’t want that on my conscience and I don’t think any of my guys do,” Carlson said regarding potential accidents involving LSVs.
Committee Member Jim Richmond supported the ban, noting the potential for liability. “They’re going to go after whoever’s got the deepest pockets,” Richmond said.
The committee voted 5-1 to move the amended ordinance, which includes the ban on LSVs on county streets, to the Executive Committee. Member Daniel Butler was the sole opposing vote.
Latest News Stories
Judge: SCOTUS ruling doesn’t necessarily end block on Trump DEI orders
Illinois quick hits: Man charged with threatening Trump; judge grants injunction in shelter funding case
WATCH: IL GOP Rep: Sanctuary expansion bill may expose many to civil lawsuits
WATCH: Family, friends remember Bailey family at celebration of life
WATCH: Amid criticism, Pritzker defends using expletive to tell Trump where to go
New Lenox Fire District to Hire EMTs to Combat Paramedic Shortage
Election integrity advocates urge reform after Illinois scores low in global survey
WATCH: Pritzker’s rhetoric criticized; tax amnesty program; status of Guard lawsuit
Illinois quick hits: Pritzker uses expletive with teachers union; Paprocki reacts to assisted suicide bill
New Lenox D122 Board Approves $74.1M Budget for 2025-26 School Year
New Lenox Park District Advances $1.5 Million Bond Plan for Playground Overhauls and Future Projects
Appeals court: IT firm can’t make insurer foot bill for $28M face scan deal