Tariff authority decision still awaited from Supreme Court
Tariff authority by second-term Republican President Donald Trump was not decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday, meaning the federal government can continue to collect the revenue for now.
Businesses around the world had braced for a possible decision, but the high court released an unrelated opinion. The opinion could come nearly any time before the end of June.
Trump has made tariffs a central part of both his domestic and foreign agendas during his second term. Last April, Trump imposed import taxes of at least 10% on every U.S. trading partner. Since then, the president has suspended, changed, increased, decreased and reimposed tariffs under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
A group of states and small businesses challenged Trump’s tariffs under the 1977 law, winning in two lower courts before the administration appealed to the Supreme Court.
The high court agreed to hear the case on an expedited basis, given the economic stakes at issue. The Trump administration could be forced to refund more than $133.5 billion in tariffs to importers if the Supreme Court sides with the states and small businesses in the case.
Trump has called the case one of the most important of all time and said that an unfavorable ruling could result in economic ruin for America.
Businesses have reported that tariffs have pushed up prices for consumers.
Latest News Stories
Debt confidence hits two-year low amid affordability concerns
Candidates debate healthcare for Nevada primary
ExxonMobil shareholders approve plan to redomicile to Texas
U.S., Iran may be on the cusp of tentative ceasefire extension
Pritzker indicates he’ll sign new insurance regulations
Election 2026: For one of the four seats, trouble brews
Treasury reveals how to sign up for Trump Accounts on new app
Republicans claim fake transparency in early budget, demand better
Ceasefire in question as U.S. accuses Iran of violations
Supreme Court rules against prison sentence reductions
Illinois may take DOJ ‘Anti-Weaponization’ payouts from residents
Supreme Court rules in favor of racially biased jury claims