Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Spread the love

Two groups have sued a Michigan law firm for operating scholarships they allege are “racially discriminatory.”

Do No Harm, a national anti-DEI policy advocacy group, and the American Alliance for Equal Rights, filed the suit last week on behalf of three students against the law firm, Buckfire & Buckfire, P.C.

The lawsuit alleges that the firm’s Medical Diversity Scholarship and Law School Diversity Scholarship violate the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed basic civil rights regardless of race. That applies to racial discrimination in contracts, which includes scholarships.

The Center Square spoke exclusively with representatives from both parties involved in the lawsuit.

“Merit, not race, should serve as the legitimate basis for awarding scholarships,” Dr. Kurt Miceli, medical director at Do No Harm told The Center Square. “Yet, discredited frameworks such as critical race theory and racial concordance have infiltrated medical and legal institutions, propagating divisive identity politics.”

Lawrence J. Buckfire, president of Buckfire Law Firm and its lead trial attorney, called the lawsuit “completely frivolous legally and factually.” He dismissed the plaintiffs and their motivations for filing the lawsuit.

“It was filed by two nasty, divisive organizations that intentionally target businesses and institutions that promote diversity,” Buckfire told The Center Square. “The three members who complain they didn’t win scholarships were not good candidates and it’s just sour grapes they lost. The plaintiffs targeted the wrong law firm in the wrong venue to pursue such a hoax of a case.”

Both scholarships in question require applicants to be “a member of an ethnic, racial, or other minority” or “demonstrate a defined commitment to issues of diversity within their community.”

Operated by the firm since 2014, the scholarships award a $2,000 scholarship to one recipient each year. Buckfire said the scholarships are not racially biased.

“All people, regardless of race and ethnicity, were eligible to apply for the scholarships,” he said. “It is clearly laid out on the scholarship submission forms. The fact that the losers were not awarded scholarships had nothing to do with their race, and they knew they were eligible to apply for the scholarships because they submitted applications and essays.”

While white candidates were eligible for the scholarships, the lawsuit alleges they were discriminated against by not being selected for the scholarships.

“In its history, Buckfire has awarded scholarships to 25 students,” it alleges. “Zero were white.”

Miceli is certain the court will decide in favor of the plaintiffs.

“We are confident the court will determine that Buckfire has indeed violated the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and will order them to cease discriminating based on race,” he said. “The objective then is not to end Buckfire’s scholarships, but rather see to it that they are awarded on lawful and legitimate grounds—like merit—rather than race-based considerations.”

On the other hand, Buckfire anticipates the case will soon be dismissed. He alleged the students represented in the case are “three white guys whining about not winning a $2,000 diversity scholarship” and stood by the scholarships.

“As the son of a child Holocaust survivor, it was instilled upon me at an early age that our country should embrace people of all races and religions, and promoting diversity is very important to our firm,” he said. “Our scholarships have helped many people over the years achieve their educational goals.”

Edward Blum, president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights, argued the scholarships are illegal.

“The fact that a law firm is flagrantly discriminating against certain individuals because of their race is flabbergasting,” Blum said in a press release. “There are many deserving students from all races and ethnicities who need help affording law and medical school. Excluding some of them because of their race is unfair and unlawful.”

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Events

No events

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

will-county-board.3

Leglislative Committee Meeting Briefs

Federal Grant Deadline Extended: The Surface Transportation Reauthorization deadline has been extended to May 30 for policy submissions, with both House and Senate committees actively seeking stakeholder input ahead of...
will-county-board.3

Speed Limits Reduced on Two Township Roads

The committee approved new speed zones for two township roads based on engineering studies showing current limits exceed safe driving speeds. Offner Road in Green Garden Township will have a...
will-county-board.2

Will County Finance Committee Approves Juvenile Detention Center Upgrades

Committee votes to keep facility operational, moves forward with compliance modifications Will County Finance Committee members voted unanimously Monday to recommend keeping the River Valley Detention Center operational and making...
will-county-board.2

Major Grade Separation Projects Advance with Engineering Contracts

The committee approved two significant engineering agreements for major railroad overpass projects totaling over $4 million. TranSystems Corporation received a $4,003,256 contract for construction engineering services on the Lorenzo Road...
County-Board-Room

County Authorizes Condemnation for Francis Road Project

The committee authorized the State's Attorney's Office to proceed with condemnation cases for right-of-way acquisition needed for Francis Road improvements between Gougar Road and Interstate 80. Eight property parcels are...
will-county-board

Solar Farm Access Approved for Manhattan-Arsenal Road

The committee granted access approval for a solar farm development on Manhattan-Arsenal Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Cherry Hill Road. The MCH Solar 1 project, developed by Soltage LLC,...
will-county-board.3

Will County Finance Committee Meeting Briefs

Budget Transfers Approved: The Finance Committee approved transferring $18,643 within the Supervisor of Assessments budget to move funds from software licensing to computer hardware purchases. Animal Protection Services Funding: Committee...
will-county-board.2

Public Works Committee Briefs

Major Projects Update: Construction continues on several major projects including the 80th Avenue expressway overpass, Laraway Road widening near Cedar Road, and Bell Road improvements. The Bell Road project at...
will-county-board

Capital Improvements & IT Committee Briefs

Bed donation program: Will County donated old beds from Sunny Hill Nursing Home to Joliet Junior College and Project Cure after the nursing home received all new beds for residents....
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic

Frankfort Board Approves New Wendy’s on Route 30 With Numerous Modifications

A new Wendy's restaurant is set to be built at the northwest corner of U.S. Route 30 and Frankfort Square Road after the Frankfort Village Board unanimously approved the project...
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic

Historic Downtown Frankfort Property Granted Deck and Patio Variances

The owners of a historic mixed-use building in downtown Frankfort have received approval for six zoning variances to construct a new paver patio and a second-floor rear deck. The Frankfort...
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic

Frankfort Approves $1.3 Million in Bills, Including Annual Insurance Payment

The Frankfort Village Board authorized over $1.3 million in payments at its meeting Monday, with nearly half of the total amount covering the village's annual insurance premiums. Trustees unanimously approved...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Frankfort Village Board for June 2, 2025

Wendy's Project Approved with Multiple Variances: The Village Board gave final approval for a new Wendy's restaurant at U.S. Route 30 and Frankfort Square Road. The project required a major change...
frankfort-park-district.1

Frankfort Park Board Holds Closed-Door Talks on Five Oaks HOA Dispute

The Frankfort Park District Board of Commissioners entered into a closed executive session on Tuesday, May 27, to discuss pending litigation concerning the Five Oaks Park parcel, signaling a deepening...
Frankfort-Township-Logo-Graphic

Frankfort Township Approves Employee Raises, Details Major Infrastructure and Service Projects

Frankfort Township employees will receive a 2.5% cost-of-living pay increase after the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the adjustment at its Monday, May 19 meeting. The move came as Supervisor...