Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Michigan law firm sued over alleged racial bias in diversity scholarships

Spread the love

Two groups have sued a Michigan law firm for operating scholarships they allege are “racially discriminatory.”

Do No Harm, a national anti-DEI policy advocacy group, and the American Alliance for Equal Rights, filed the suit last week on behalf of three students against the law firm, Buckfire & Buckfire, P.C.

The lawsuit alleges that the firm’s Medical Diversity Scholarship and Law School Diversity Scholarship violate the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed basic civil rights regardless of race. That applies to racial discrimination in contracts, which includes scholarships.

The Center Square spoke exclusively with representatives from both parties involved in the lawsuit.

“Merit, not race, should serve as the legitimate basis for awarding scholarships,” Dr. Kurt Miceli, medical director at Do No Harm told The Center Square. “Yet, discredited frameworks such as critical race theory and racial concordance have infiltrated medical and legal institutions, propagating divisive identity politics.”

Lawrence J. Buckfire, president of Buckfire Law Firm and its lead trial attorney, called the lawsuit “completely frivolous legally and factually.” He dismissed the plaintiffs and their motivations for filing the lawsuit.

“It was filed by two nasty, divisive organizations that intentionally target businesses and institutions that promote diversity,” Buckfire told The Center Square. “The three members who complain they didn’t win scholarships were not good candidates and it’s just sour grapes they lost. The plaintiffs targeted the wrong law firm in the wrong venue to pursue such a hoax of a case.”

Both scholarships in question require applicants to be “a member of an ethnic, racial, or other minority” or “demonstrate a defined commitment to issues of diversity within their community.”

Operated by the firm since 2014, the scholarships award a $2,000 scholarship to one recipient each year. Buckfire said the scholarships are not racially biased.

“All people, regardless of race and ethnicity, were eligible to apply for the scholarships,” he said. “It is clearly laid out on the scholarship submission forms. The fact that the losers were not awarded scholarships had nothing to do with their race, and they knew they were eligible to apply for the scholarships because they submitted applications and essays.”

While white candidates were eligible for the scholarships, the lawsuit alleges they were discriminated against by not being selected for the scholarships.

“In its history, Buckfire has awarded scholarships to 25 students,” it alleges. “Zero were white.”

Miceli is certain the court will decide in favor of the plaintiffs.

“We are confident the court will determine that Buckfire has indeed violated the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and will order them to cease discriminating based on race,” he said. “The objective then is not to end Buckfire’s scholarships, but rather see to it that they are awarded on lawful and legitimate grounds—like merit—rather than race-based considerations.”

On the other hand, Buckfire anticipates the case will soon be dismissed. He alleged the students represented in the case are “three white guys whining about not winning a $2,000 diversity scholarship” and stood by the scholarships.

“As the son of a child Holocaust survivor, it was instilled upon me at an early age that our country should embrace people of all races and religions, and promoting diversity is very important to our firm,” he said. “Our scholarships have helped many people over the years achieve their educational goals.”

Edward Blum, president of the American Alliance for Equal Rights, argued the scholarships are illegal.

“The fact that a law firm is flagrantly discriminating against certain individuals because of their race is flabbergasting,” Blum said in a press release. “There are many deserving students from all races and ethnicities who need help affording law and medical school. Excluding some of them because of their race is unfair and unlawful.”

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Events

No events

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic-June-16-2025

Frankfort Board Approves Indoor Recreation Facility and Setback Variance

The Frankfort Village Board gave its approval to two separate development projects Monday night, clearing the way for a new indoor pickleball facility and a residential addition. Trustees unanimously granted...
Frankfort-Village-Board-Meeting-Graphic-June-16-2025

Meeting Briefs: Frankfort Village Board for June 16, 2025

Downtown Patios Approved, Parking Waived: The Village Board approved outdoor seating for The Loft and Grounded Coffee Bar on Ash Street. To support the downtown businesses, trustees also voted to waive...
Will-County-Executive-Committee-Meeting-June-12-2025

Mental Health Board Awards $5 Million in Grants to Will County Organizations

The Will County Community Mental Health Board has distributed over $5 million in grants to 39 local organizations, marking the completion of its inaugural funding cycle since voters approved the...
frankfort-square-park-district.2

Frankfort Square Park District Adopts Budget and Appropriation Ordinance, Updates Financial Policy

The Frankfort Square Park District Board of Commissioners formally adopted its Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for the 2025-2026 fiscal year on Thursday, finalizing the district's legal spending authority for the...
Will-County-Executive-Committee-Meeting-June-12-2025

County Board Approves Major Code Updates, Discusses Employee Benefits

The Will County Board Executive Committee approved several ordinance updates Wednesday while engaging in detailed discussions about employee compensation and benefits. The committee passed ordinances updating three chapters of the...
frankfort-square-park-district.1

Major Park District Projects Advance as Hunter Prairie Park Gets Green Light

Work on the Frankfort Square Park District's three major capital projects is hitting key milestones, with the long-awaited redevelopment of Hunter Prairie Park now officially underway. Executive Director Audrey Marcquenski...
Meeting-Briefs

Executive Committee June 12 Meeting Briefs

Property Purchase Approved: The county authorized purchase of two parcels along Governor's Highway in Monee for $545,000 to establish a roadway maintenance facility for the eastern end of the county....
frankfort-square-park-district.2

Developer to Donate Land, Playground for New Park in Tinley Park

A new park is coming to a Tinley Park development thanks to a land and equipment donation from a local home builder. Frank Bradley, owner of Crana Homes, is donating...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Briefs: Frankfort Square Park District for June 12, 2025

The Frankfort Square Park District Board of Commissioners formally adopted its annual Budget and Appropriation Ordinance on June 12, a key legal step that sets the district’s spending authority for...
frankfort-school-district-161.2-e1754272831494

Summit Hill Board Approves School Resource Officer for Two Schools in Contentious Vote

The Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education voted to hire a School Resource Officer (SRO) to serve two of its schools, approving an annual expenditure of up to...
frankfort-school-district-161.1

Summit Hill School Board Reverses Controversial Principal Non-Renewal Decision

In a significant reversal, the Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education voted to repeal previous resolutions that aimed to not renew the contract of an unnamed principal, effectively...
frankfort-school-district-161.2-e1754272831494

Meeting Briefs: Summit Hill School District 161 for June 11, 2025

The Summit Hill School District 161 Board of Education made several major decisions at its June 11 meeting, including the hiring of a School Resource Officer for two schools after...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Will County to Draft New Harassment Policy Amid Debate Over Board Authority

The Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee will draft a new, county-wide general harassment policy after a lengthy debate on Tuesday revealed the complexities of the county’s legal obligations and...
Will-County-Ad-Hoc-Ordinance-Review-Committee-Meeting-June-10-2025

Committee Uncovers Gaps in County Asset Tracking, Calls for Better System

A review of Will County’s fiscal policies on Tuesday highlighted significant gaps in how the county tracks its physical assets, from office furniture to squad cars, prompting calls from the...
frankfort-park-district

Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules

The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it "cannot be...