Panelists debate costs of energy legislation as Illinoisans struggle to pay bills
(The Center Square) – Some consumer advocates say battery storage legislation would help reduce energy price spikes, but others say an Illinois Senate bill’s provisions would lead to net costs for customers.
The Illinois Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee discussed energy storage provisions of House amendment to Senate Bill 40 in a virtual subject matter hearing on Thursday.
The committee chair, state Sen. Steve Stadelman, D-Rockford, said lawmakers might consider legislation during the fall veto session in an attempt to ensure energy affordability and reliability for consumers.
United Congregations of Metro-East Executive Director Darnell Tingle told the committee that high utility costs are forcing families to make brutal choices.
“Do I pay Ameren or do I pay the rent? Do I keep the [air conditioning] running in this dangerous heat, or do I put food on the table? This is a crisis of health and safety,” Tingle said, adding that Illinois “can and should do better.”
Citizens Utility Board executive director Sarah Moskowitz said SB 40 could help get large-scale battery storage online quickly.
“This speed-to-market attribute is really important as we are already experiencing the costs of inaction,” Moskowitz said
Citing Energy Information Administration data, Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers Chairman Phillip Golden said California and New York implemented centralized battery procurement policies.
“You will see their energy costs are, respectively, 60% and 100% higher than what Illinois paid in just June,” Golden said.
Golden said such battery developments resulted in net payments from consumers to battery storage developers.
State Sen. Terri Bryant, R-Murphysboro, said SB 40 would not provide immediate relief and could only guarantee a cost increase.
State Sen. Sue Rezin, R-Morris, asked why the bill did not include cost caps for battery storage.
“In the past we’ve put cost caps in just to make sure utility bills don’t go up. In the bills that we have passed where there wasn’t a cost cap, the bills have gone through the roof and now we’re hearing from customers,” Rezin explained.
Stadelman said a second subject matter hearing on energy issues would likely be held in early October.
Latest News Stories
WATCH: Pritzker’s rhetoric criticized; tax amnesty program; status of Guard lawsuit
Illinois quick hits: Pritzker uses expletive with teachers union; Paprocki reacts to assisted suicide bill
New Lenox D122 Board Approves $74.1M Budget for 2025-26 School Year
New Lenox Park District Advances $1.5 Million Bond Plan for Playground Overhauls and Future Projects
Appeals court: IT firm can’t make insurer foot bill for $28M face scan deal
Illinois soybean farmers face uncertainty amid MAHA push against seed oils
Crete Township ‘Tiny Home’ Owner Appeals Permit Denial
Illinois quick hits: Pritzker to sign tax, toll increases to bail out transit
Trump slices China fentanyl tariff in half following meeting with Xi
Senior Shared Housing Facility Recommended for Approval in Crete Township
Trump orders Department of War to begin testing nuclear weapons
WATCH: Tax proposals draw questions from Pritzker and GOP state rep
