
Board Postpones County Purchasing Code Overhaul Amid Union Contractor Debate
Members seek clarification on requirements that could favor unionized businesses
The Will County Board postponed action on proposed changes to county purchasing ordinances after members raised concerns about language that could effectively exclude non-union contractors from public projects.
The proposed ordinance updates, which would replace 1992-era procurement rules, include new “responsible bidder” requirements such as proof of legal registration, tax compliance, workers compensation insurance, substance abuse policies, and participation in approved apprenticeship programs.
Speaker Joe VanDuyne initially proposed removing only the “local preference” provisions while advancing the responsible bidder standards, citing the need to address increasingly tight bid margins and unauthorized subcontractor issues.
“We had an issue as recently as 48 hours ago where there was a potential unauthorized subcontractor on a job,” VanDuyne told the board, explaining how the new requirements would prevent such problems.
Union vs. Non-Union Concerns
Several board members questioned whether the apprenticeship requirements would effectively exclude non-union contractors, despite assurances that any qualified company could bid.
“Only union companies will meet these requirements,” said Member Daniel Butler. “There’s no private company that I know of that could meet all these requirements.”
Member Dave Oxley noted that the Department of Labor apprenticeship requirements typically favor union contractors because “non-union companies don’t have the availability to that because of their apprenticeship programs.”
Member Katie Dean Schlottman raised concerns about veteran-owned businesses: “There’s a lot of very well trained veterans that come out of military service who start businesses that are capable of doing public work projects, and I guess we’re just going to overlook all of the veterans who are trying to get to work.”
Postponement Decision
The board voted to refer the ordinance back to committee after Member Steve Balich made a motion to postpone, supported by members seeking a complete proposal rather than piecemeal approval.
“When I want an assignment, I want a complete assignment,” Dean Schlottman said. “I do not want part of it. I want a complete ordinance before I can vote yes or no.”
VanDuyne indicated the local preference provisions remain under legal review, with differing attorney opinions about their permissibility under county procurement law.
The ordinance will return to executive committee for further refinement before coming back to the full board, likely in June.
Latest News Stories

Will County Animal Protection Services Seeks New Facility Amid “Gaping Wound” of Space Crisis

Board Confronts Animal Services Crowding, Explores Future Facility Options

Will County Board Members Demand Transparency in Cannabis Tax Fund Allocation

Homer Glenn Residents Push Back on 143rd Street Widening as Officials Signal “Tentative Agreement”

Will County Forges 2026 Federal Agenda Amid D.C. Policy Shifts, ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Impacts

Health Department Seeks $1 Million Levy Increase to Prevent “Weakened System”

County Rolls Out New “OneMeeting” Software to Improve Public Access

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Finance Committee for August 5, 2025

Will County PZC Approves Rezoning for Truck Repair Facility on Manhattan Road Amid Resident Concerns

Key Stretch of Bell Road on Track for Thanksgiving Reopening, Committee Approves Additional Funds

Will County Leglislative Committee Opposes Federal Push for Heavier, Longer Trucks

Will County Reports Progress in Opioid Fight, Highlights New FDA Labeling Rules
